Should aspiring writers read award-winning fiction in their genre?
(Thanks to Nissa Annakindt for making me think about this intriguing question)
Here's some possible benefits:
~Blazes new territory, either in content or style
~Challenges commonly-held perceptions
~Demonstrates high ideals (e.g. self-sacrifice)
On the other hand, here's some reasons why I sometimes have to force myself to read award-winners:
~May not offer instant gratification. In other words, they take work to read.
~Sometimes they have depressing or tragic endings.
~Older "classics" are harder to read because of older styles of writing
~May impose specific beliefs/worldviews on the reader
If you are writer aspiring to an award-winning status, you should definitely read award-winners. But what if you want to write entertaining stories? Would you be better served reading best-sellers in your genre?
Confession: I have many more best-sellers on my reading list than award-winners. I'm currently writing a young adult science fiction, and I've only read 4 Nebula or Hugo winners.
What do you think?
Guest Post: How to Find Time For Creativity - You know how it goes. Keys in the door, shoes flung haphazardly into the entry way, and tired body plopped on the couch. You’ve got some writing to do, but...
15 hours ago